TLDR
- The U.S. Department of Justice released over 3 million documents related to the Jeffrey Epstein investigation.
- Blockstream was mentioned in 45 entries within the newly released DOJ files.
- The documents revealed that Blockstream met Jeffrey Epstein in 2014 during its seed funding round.
- At the time of the meeting, Jeffrey Epstein was a limited partner in Joi Ito’s investment fund.
- Joi Ito’s fund later made a minority investment in Blockstream after the introduction.
- Blockstream CEO Adam Back confirmed the 2014 meeting but denied any financial ties with Epstein or his estate.
The U.S. Department of Justice released over 3 million documents tied to Jeffrey Epstein, including emails referencing Bitcoin companies. Among the names mentioned is Bitcoin infrastructure firm Blockstream, with entries dating back to its early funding days. The company’s current CEO, Adam Back, issued a statement denying financial connections to Epstein.
Blockstream’s Past Meeting with Epstein Documented in DOJ Files
Blockstream appears in 45 separate entries in the newly released Epstein investigation files, dated around the company’s 2014 seed round. Emails show Blockstream met with Jeffrey Epstein during its investor roadshow, when Austin Hill was CEO. Adam Back, who later took over, addressed the controversy publicly.
At the time, Epstein was linked to Joi Ito’s fund, which introduced Blockstream to potential investors, including Epstein. Ito, then director of the MIT Media Lab, had financial ties to Epstein through limited partnership arrangements. That fund later made a minority investment in Blockstream.
Adam Back confirmed this in a statement on X, formerly Twitter, saying, “Blockstream met with Jeffrey Epstein, who was described at the time as a limited partner in Ito’s fund.” He clarified the sequence of events, explaining that Epstein had no formal investment in Blockstream. “That fund later invested a minority stake in Blockstream,” Back added.
In 2014, during Blockstream’s seed-round investor roadshow, the company was introduced to then MIT Media Lab director Joi Ito. Subsequently Blockstream met with Jeffrey Epstein, who was described at the time as a limited partner in Ito’s fund. That fund later invested a minority…
— Adam Back (@adam3us) February 1, 2026
Adam Back Responds to Epstein Claims and Clarifies Timeline
After the DOJ documents surfaced, Adam Back responded swiftly on social media, aiming to clarify Blockstream’s connection. He wrote that the company met Epstein once, in the context of a roadshow, not a financial partnership. “Blockstream has no direct nor indirect financial connection with Jeffrey Epstein or his estate,” Back stated.
He emphasized that Ito’s fund divested its Blockstream shares shortly after investing, citing conflicts of interest. “A few months later, Ito’s fund divested its Blockstream shares due to a potential conflict of interest,” Back explained. This divestment followed internal reviews and external concerns raised at the time.
Despite the clarification, users on social media criticized the delayed transparency from Blockstream’s leadership. One user replied, “Funny how people only release statements once files get leaked.” Another questioned the meeting timing, stating Epstein had already pleaded guilty by 2008.
Other Crypto Figures and Firms Mentioned Alongside Jeffrey Epstein
The released documents not only reference Blockstream but also contain emails involving other key crypto founders. Among those mentioned are executives tied to Ripple Labs and Stellar, with Epstein appearing in those email threads. One thread includes Austin Hill and shows Reid Hoffman was cc’d in communications.
These entries raise questions about Epstein’s attempts to engage with early digital currency startups and infrastructure. Records show interest from Epstein in emerging technologies, including blockchain and Bitcoin ventures. The files also show consistent outreach to tech entrepreneurs during that period.
However, no records confirm any completed investments in Ripple or Stellar by Epstein. His role appears more connected to conversations or meetings, with no verified financial commitments. As with Blockstream, links to these firms reflect historical communication rather than confirmed partnerships.
