TLDRs;
- Adobe shares dropped nearly 8% after the company agreed to a $75 million settlement with U.S. authorities over subscription practices.
- Regulators accused Adobe of hiding early termination fees and making it difficult for customers to cancel subscriptions online.
- The lawsuit alleged Adobe used design tactics known as “dark patterns” to obscure key subscription terms from users.
- Despite denying wrongdoing, Adobe said it streamlined its sign-up and cancellation systems and welcomed resolution of the legal dispute.
Shares of Adobe (ADBE) slid almost 8% after the software giant agreed to pay $75 million to resolve a lawsuit brought by U.S. regulators over its subscription cancellation practices. The settlement closes a dispute with the U.S. Department of Justice and the Federal Trade Commission that had drawn attention to how some companies design online subscription services.
The complaint, filed in June 2024, alleged that Adobe made it difficult for users to cancel certain subscriptions and failed to clearly disclose termination penalties. Regulators argued that the company’s subscription structure included fees that were often buried in fine print or hidden behind multiple layers of hyperlinks.
Authorities claimed that these practices resulted in customers being surprised by cancellation charges that sometimes reached hundreds of dollars.
Although Adobe agreed to settle the case financially, the company did not admit wrongdoing. Instead, it stated that it had already taken steps to simplify the subscription sign-up and cancellation process, saying it was satisfied to bring the matter to a close.
Allegations of Hidden Termination Fees
At the center of the lawsuit was Adobe’s “annual paid monthly” subscription plan, which allows customers to pay monthly for a year-long commitment. Regulators alleged that customers who attempted to cancel early were required to pay an early termination fee equivalent to 50% of the remaining payments.
According to the complaint, this fee was not prominently disclosed during sign-up. Instead, it allegedly appeared in small text or only through hover-over icons and embedded links within the interface.
Officials argued that many users only discovered the fee after attempting to cancel, describing the experience as an unexpected “ambush” during the cancellation process.
The lawsuit also named two executives as defendants: David Wadhwani, president of Adobe’s digital media division, and Maninder Sawhney, a company vice president. Their inclusion reflected a growing regulatory approach in which authorities hold not only companies but also executives accountable for alleged deceptive practices.
Subscription Model Under Scrutiny
The legal battle highlights the growing importance of subscription revenue in Adobe’s business model. For the quarter ending February 27, subscriptions generated 97% of the company’s $6.4 billion in revenue, underscoring how central recurring payments are to its financial performance.
Over the past decade, Adobe has transformed from a traditional software licensing company into a subscription-based platform centered around services like Creative Cloud and Document Cloud.
Adobe agrees to pay $75M to resolve a US government lawsuit accusing it of concealing hefty termination fees and making it difficult to cancel subscriptions (@jonathanstempel / Reuters)https://t.co/8d7lCCdsN9https://t.co/L8sBmjbkBV
📥 Send tips! https://t.co/wlNZvXuhJs
— Techmeme (@Techmeme) March 13, 2026
However, the case underscores increasing scrutiny from regulators over how subscription systems are structured, particularly when cancellation procedures are complex or fees are not clearly communicated.
Consumer protection agencies have become increasingly focused on what they call “dark patterns”, design techniques that nudge users into decisions they might not otherwise make, such as signing up for services or continuing subscriptions unintentionally.





