TLDR
- Punchbowl reported that U.S. lawmakers are weighing a delay to the CLARITY Act.
- Senator Thom Tillis urged the Senate Banking Committee to move markup to May.
- The proposed delay would allow more time for a stablecoin compromise.
- Banks are lobbying lawmakers to tighten rules for crypto firms and stablecoins.
- The Senate Banking Committee faces a narrow window to act on the bill this week.
U.S. lawmakers are weighing a delay to the CLARITY Act as talks over stablecoin rules continue. Punchbowl reported that Senator Thom Tillis asked the Senate Banking Committee to move the markup to May. The proposed shift would allow more time for a compromise. Banks are also pressing lawmakers to tighten restrictions on crypto firms and stablecoin activity.
Senate Considers a New Timeline
The Senate Banking Committee is facing a narrow window to decide how to move ahead. According to Punchbowl, Senator Thom Tillis urged the panel to delay the markup until May. That request came as talks over stablecoin language remained unsettled. A delay would give lawmakers more time to work on a compromise.
Stablecoin provisions have become a central part of the broader debate. Lawmakers are now balancing market growth with banking concerns and oversight goals. The CLARITY Act is part of a wider effort to define rules for digital assets in the United States. A markup delay would not end that process.
CLARITY ACT LIKELY TO BE DELAYED AS BANKS PUSH BACK ON STABLECOINS
U.S. lawmakers are considering a delay to the CLARITY Act amid rising pressure from banks, per Punchbowl.
Senator Thom Tillis has urged the Senate Banking Committee to shift the markup to May.
The move is aimed… pic.twitter.com/BAEWCtF5t5
— BSCN (@BSCNews) April 21, 2026
It would, however, show that stablecoin rules are now a major issue in the bill. The committee must decide whether to keep the current schedule or allow more time. That decision could shape the pace of crypto legislation in the Senate. It may also affect related talks in other parts of Congress.
Banks Push for Tighter Stablecoin Rules
Banks are lobbying lawmakers as the debate moves forward. Their focus is on stronger limits for crypto firms and on tighter stablecoin rules. The lobbying effort comes as stablecoins gain a larger role in payments and digital finance.
Bank concerns often center on deposits, payment flows, and settlement systems. Stablecoins can move value quickly, and they may compete with bank services in some areas. That has made stablecoin policy a key issue for traditional financial firms. The reported push includes efforts to curb stablecoin yield features.
Banks also want lawmakers to slow the legislative process while those details are reviewed. These steps show that stablecoin policy is now closely tied to broader financial regulation. Lawmakers now face pressure from both digital asset firms and the banking sector. Crypto firms want clearer rules and faster action. Banks want stricter controls and more time for negotiations. That split is shaping the current debate around the bill.
Stablecoin Debate Moves to the Center
The current dispute shows how much stablecoins now matter in U.S. policy talks. The issue is no longer whether stablecoins should be addressed. The focus has shifted to how they should be regulated and who should operate under those rules. That change has placed stablecoins near the center of the CLARITY Act discussion.
Even if the bill is delayed, the debate is likely to continue. Stablecoin language now appears to be one of the main points that lawmakers must resolve. A delay would likely be aimed at finding terms that can win broader support. That may include limits on issuers, reserve standards, consumer protections, and yield structures. Those points remain active areas of discussion among lawmakers and industry groups.
For now, the committee’s next move is under close watch. The outcome will show whether lawmakers can reach a near-term compromise. It will also show how much influence banking concerns have on the current shape of crypto legislation.
