TLDR
- Code is Law examines the ethical issues behind major crypto hacks like Mt. Gox.
- The documentary questions if exploiting code vulnerabilities is morally acceptable.
- Code is Law critiques the limitations of using code as law in cryptocurrency.
- The film explores the role of human judgment in enforcing crypto regulations.
James Craig’s upcoming documentary Code is Law examines the ethical complexities surrounding major crypto hacks. The film focuses on two key events in cryptocurrency history—the 2014 Mt. Gox hack and the 2016 DAO hack. It questions whether the attackers in these incidents should be seen as criminals or simply as players using the logic of the code to their advantage.
Exploring the World of Crypto Hacks
The documentary Code is Law takes a closer look at two of the most notorious hacks in the cryptocurrency world. The Mt. Gox hack, which happened in 2014, remains one of the largest and most well-known crypto thefts. The film also covers the DAO hack from 2016, a critical moment in Ethereum’s history, where an attacker exploited a vulnerability in the code to steal $160 million.
These hacks raised fundamental questions about the nature of digital currencies and the rules governing them. Can code alone function as law? Is it ethical for attackers to exploit weaknesses in a smart contract if the code itself allows it? These are the core questions that the documentary grapples with, offering perspectives from both the attackers and those affected by the events.
The ‘Code is Law’ Philosophy
The phrase “code is law” is widely associated with Lawrence Lessig, a legal scholar who argued that the architecture of the internet could regulate behavior much like traditional laws. In his view, code can act as a set of rules, shaping how people interact with technology.
However, the documentary critiques this concept. It suggests that while code might govern the digital space, it fails to address the full range of human behavior. The rigid logic of code cannot easily handle the unpredictability and complexity of real-world actions. In the film, the idea of code as law is shown to have serious limitations when it comes to regulating behavior in the unpredictable world of cryptocurrency.
The Role of Human Judgment in Enforcing Laws
The film also touches on the importance of human judgment in enforcing laws. While code can set parameters, it cannot replace human discretion. In situations like the DAO hack, where an exploit was based on the contract’s logic, the need for human intervention becomes clear.
Flexible rules and human-administered laws can adapt more easily to unforeseen challenges. The documentary suggests that relying solely on code to regulate behavior leaves a system vulnerable. It emphasizes that human oversight is essential for addressing complex issues that technology cannot predict or manage effectively.
The Power of Enforcement: Governments vs. Code
Another central theme of Code is Law is the relationship between technology and state power. As the film shows, even in a decentralized system like cryptocurrency, victims of attacks often turn to government authorities for help. The idea that code can act as law is challenged by the reality that governments hold the monopoly on violence, which allows them to enforce laws in ways that code alone cannot.
When an attacker exploits a vulnerability, as seen in the DAO hack or other crypto incidents, it is often the legal system that steps in to provide recourse. The documentary suggests that the absence of a real-world enforcement mechanism in the world of cryptocurrency leaves a gap that code cannot fill. This highlights the limitations of using code as a stand-in for law, especially when it comes to serious breaches and the need for real-world consequences.
Code is Law brings attention to the moral debates and challenges of applying the principles of code to the realm of law. By exploring these famous crypto hacks, the film raises important questions about the boundaries of digital regulation and the role of human intervention in maintaining justice.
