As 2025 starts winding down, Shiba Inu price predictions are starting to falter. Analysts are backing PEPE over this once must-have meme coin but at the same time, they’re tipping LayerBrett (LBRETT), a new sensational token, to outshine both meme coins. This article explains why.
Why investors are backing LBRETT to win the memecoin supercycle
Shiba Inu and Pepe are OG meme coins, but their shine is starting to dull. They have no real utility and they depend majorly on hype to post serious profits. Even though the current crypto climate is bullish, both coins are still struggling to post tangible profits.
The meme market is in dire need of coins that embrace meme culture but also sports real-world utility. That is where LayerBrett comes in. A trailblazing new project, it has meme origins but simultaneously allows quick transfer of crypto assets, at an extremely cheap price, and with so much ease.
On top of that, LBRETT is new and is yet to go on its own ballistic run. Its decentralized structure, self custodial nature, and lack of KYC burdens endears it specially to meme lovers. Then there’s the mouthwatering 20,000% APY it offers stakers, a feature that is attracting loads of new investors.
LBRET is heading to the top, and nothing can stop it. Meme power. Real speed. True utility. It offers all of these and more. That is why investors see it as the next 100x meme coin. No one wants to miss out on it.
Shiba Inu price prediction: Will 5th year anniversary sentiments drive up SHIB price?
Based on Shiba Inu’s recent price action, the hype around meme coins without utility might be over. SHIB has struggled to gain tangible value over the last couple of months, and experts are not very optimistic about future Shiba Inu price predictions.
Source: CoinMarketCap/CoinDesi
However, there’s renewed hope that SHIB’s price could rise as the project clocks its 5th year anniversary. Whale accumulation is already in session, and the formation of a double bottom pattern with support at $0.0000103 suggests better days might be ahead. At the same time, drop below this critical level could lead to a potential crash.
Analysts back PEPE over SHIB
Even though SHIB has a bigger market cap, analysts are favoring PEPE because it has a more compelling narrative. Pepe the frog is a world-wide internet meme and millions of meme lovers can easily get behind its story.
PEPE price action vs Shiba Inu’s. Source: CoinMarketCap
At the same time, PEPE makes no pretense of utility, instead leaning into its viral roots and community-driven hype. Then there’s its price action, which isn’t particularly impressive, but has seen more action than SHIB over the last couple of months.
PEPE’s daily trading volume of around $400 million is quadruple that of SHIB at the moment. Its increased trading activity could precipitate a new rally that could easily overshadow SHIB and push PEPE to new heights.
The clear winner
While PEPE and Shiba Inu are established meme coins, they pose no threat to Layer Brett due to its new status. LBRETT combines meme culture with legitimate blockchain scaling solutions. It is positioned to rival not only meme coins but also established Layer 2s like Optimisma and Arbitrum.
It offers an extremely generous staking reward and is only going to appreciate sporadically with time. That is why it is the clear winner of the crypto meme supercycle. If you want to rake in 100x crypto profits before the end of 2025, LBRETT is the coin for you.
Layer Brett is available in presale—but don’t wait too late. This is YOUR opportunity to get in early on the most scalable meme project to ever launch on Ethereum.
Disclaimer: This media platform provides the content of this article on an "as-is" basis, without any warranties or representations of any kind, express or implied. We assume no responsibility for any inaccuracies, errors, or omissions. We do not assume any responsibility or liability for the accuracy, content, images, videos, licenses, completeness, legality, or reliability of the information presented herein. Any concerns, complaints, or copyright issues related to this article should be directed to the content provider mentioned above.
