TLDR
- Blockchain’s 24/7 trading can cause sharp price movements in tokenized DAT stocks.
- Smart contract vulnerabilities and hacking risks pose threats to tokenized assets.
- Tokenized DAT equity exposes investors to both crypto and corporate governance risks.
- Regulatory clarity on tokenized stocks remains uncertain despite growing market value.
The growing trend of tokenizing shares of Digital Asset Treasury (DAT) companies on blockchain platforms has raised concerns within the crypto industry. Experts warn that this process increases investor risk, given the unique challenges posed by 24/7 blockchain trading, as well as vulnerabilities related to smart contracts and hacking. These risks could escalate, particularly as tokenized stocks gain traction and attract regulatory scrutiny.
Risk of 24/7 Blockchain Trading
The decentralized nature of blockchain networks means that trading happens round the clock, unlike traditional stock markets with fixed operating hours. Kadan Stadelmann, Chief Technology Officer of the Komodo platform, pointed out that this constant market activity could lead to sharp price movements for tokenized stocks. “These sharp on-chain price movements may happen outside traditional market hours, potentially leading to a run on a company’s stock,” Stadelmann explained.
He added that such volatility could overwhelm a company’s ability to respond swiftly, especially when both tokenized and traditional shares are involved. While traditional markets allow for measures like suspending trading during periods of high volatility, blockchain-based platforms lack such mechanisms. As a result, companies may struggle to manage price fluctuations, which could harm investor confidence and exacerbate the risks.
Smart Contract and Hacking Risks
In addition to the issues tied to continuous trading, experts also raised concerns about the risks associated with smart contracts. Smart contracts are self-executing agreements with the terms directly written into code. These contracts could be vulnerable to coding errors or exploits, which could lead to significant losses. If a vulnerability is exploited, it could result in unauthorized access to the underlying assets or tokenized shares of a company.
The risk of hacking further complicates matters, particularly in the context of digital assets and tokenized securities. Companies that tokenize their stocks may find their assets exposed to a higher risk of cyberattacks. As Stadelmann highlighted, the underlying funds and tokenized shares are both at risk of being compromised in such scenarios, leading to severe consequences for investors.
Double Layer of Risk for Investors
Tokenizing the shares of DAT companies does not just introduce the risk associated with cryptocurrency volatility. Kanny Lee, CEO of SecondSwap, emphasized that it creates an additional layer of complexity. Lee stated, “Tokenizing DAT equity creates a synthetic on top of a synthetic, exposing investors to both the volatility of crypto assets and the complexities of corporate governance and securities law.”
This dual exposure means that investors are not only susceptible to the fluctuating value of digital assets but also to the regulatory and governance challenges tied to traditional corporate equity. With both sets of risks at play, investors face a more complicated environment than with traditional stocks or digital assets alone.
Regulatory Uncertainty in Tokenized Stocks
As tokenized stocks gain popularity, with their market value crossing $1.3 billion, regulatory uncertainty continues to cloud the landscape. While the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) has shown interest in 24/7 capital markets, the regulatory framework for tokenized stocks remains unclear. The SEC is exploring blockchain-based stock trading but has yet to provide clear guidelines on how to regulate tokenized shares.
The lack of legal clarity complicates matters further for companies and investors alike. With regulatory bodies still deliberating over how to manage tokenized stocks, there is an ongoing risk of non-compliance or sudden regulatory changes. This uncertainty has led some industry experts to call for more defined rules to ensure that tokenized stocks can thrive without exposing investors to excessive risk.
