TLDR
- Senators failed to reach a deal before the planned committee markup.
- Lummis said lawmakers agree on 99% of the Senate crypto bill.
- Democrats pressed ethics rules tied to First Family conflicts.
- BRCA language on non-custodial developers became a late dispute.
- The markup may move forward on a partisan basis without a deal.
Senate talks on the Clarity Act stalled before a planned committee markup, after bipartisan negotiators failed to settle disputes over ethics rules and developer protections. Democrats sought changes tied to conflicts of interest and the Blockchain Regulatory Certainty Act. Republicans said most of the bill was settled, but no final agreement was reached before the session ended.
Talks End Without a Deal
A small bipartisan group of senators ended negotiations without an agreement, according to the account provided. The talks focused on changes meant to bring more Democrats closer to supporting the Clarity Act.
The bill is aimed at setting clearer rules for digital assets in the United States. It has drawn attention from both parties because lawmakers have faced pressure to address crypto market gaps.
šØNEW: Negotiations between a small group of bipartisan senators aimed at getting Democrats to a better place on at least two outstanding Clarity Act issues wrapped for the night without a deal, Iām told. In a statement, one of the lead GOP negotiators, @SenLummis, said:ā¦
— Eleanor Terrett (@EleanorTerrett) May 14, 2026
Senator Cynthia Lummis, one of the lead Republican negotiators, said the sides had agreement on most of the measure. She said, āUltimately, we have agreement on 99% of the bill.ā Lummis also urged Democrats to keep working after the bill leaves committee. She warned that a future failure like FTX could raise blame for Congress.
Democrats Seek Ethics Language
Democrats, including Senator Adam Schiff and Senator Ruben Gallego, pushed for ethics and conflict rules before the markup. Their focus was on concerns involving First Family interests in crypto.
The negotiations appeared to make progress on that issue, based on the account provided. Still, that progress did not produce a final package before talks ended. Democrats had made the ethics language a condition for support from some members.Ā
The debate came as lawmakers considered how to limit conflicts while passing market rules. Republicans did not agree to every request before the planned vote. That left the bill moving toward markup without the bipartisan deal negotiators had sought.
BRCA Changes Become a Late Dispute
A second issue involved provisions tied to the Blockchain Regulatory Certainty Act. The BRCA language would protect non-custodial software developers from money transmitter prosecution. Supporters say those developers do not hold customer funds. They argue that treating them like money transmitters could harm blockchain software work in the United States.
Late disagreements over BRCA changes helped block a final deal. The dispute added pressure before the Banking Committee markup. The position of five pro-crypto Democrats on the committee remained unclear. The expectation, based on the account provided, was that the markup could become partisan.
The stalled talks show that lawmakers are debating the terms of regulation, not only whether crypto should be regulated. Ethics rules and developer protections now sit at the center of the dispute. Republicans want the bill to advance, while Democrats are seeking added safeguards. The next step depends on whether senators can resolve the remaining language during or after committee action.
