The crypto market is buzzing with news that six major asset managers—including Grayscale, Bitwise, and Franklin Templeton—have submitted filings for a spot XRP ETF. With regulatory barriers fading after the Ripple lawsuit, analysts are once again calling for a major XRP breakout. It’s a big moment for the token, and long-term holders are hopeful this finally delivers the rally they’ve been waiting for. But while attention builds around the XRP ETF hype and Ripple’s next move, a very different name is showing up on smart money watchlists: Layer Brett. It’s not legacy, and it’s not institutional—but it is early, explosive, and gaining fast.
XRP (XRP): XRP ETF filings put Ripple back in the spotlight, but gains may be capped
XRP is having a moment. With six asset managers—Grayscale, Bitwise, Canary Capital, CoinShares, 21Shares, and Franklin Templeton—filing for a spot XRP ETF, optimism around Ripple is back in full force. These filings come on the heels of the SEC lawsuit resolution, which cleared XRP of being a security—removing a major roadblock to institutional access.
That’s opened the door to mainstream products like ETFs, which could bring a wave of liquidity and price support. Analysts say if the XRP ETF gets approved, we could see XRP revisit the $3–$5 range. But there’s the catch—it’s a revisit. XRP has already been there, and most models aren’t predicting much beyond that.
Ripple is still a powerhouse in enterprise adoption and cross-border payments, but it’s not exactly lighting up crypto Twitter with new innovation. The project’s strength lies in its resilience, not its speed. And even if the XRP ETF goes through, many traders see it as a stabilizing force—not a rocket ship.
So yes, Ripple might break out. But for those chasing the next big parabolic move, XRP may end up being more institutional comfort than trader euphoria.
Layer Brett (LBRETT): The altcoin with energy XRP can’t match
While Ripple works the ETF angle, Layer Brett is throwing punches straight out of presale—and landing them. With a price still under $0.005 and staking rewards locked in at 2,520% APY, Layer Brett isn’t waiting for approval from regulators or institutions. It’s already building momentum, and traders are piling in.
What sets Layer Brett apart is the mix: meme coin energy with real Layer 2 infrastructure. It’s built on Ethereum’s Layer 2 for low fees and high speed, features gamified staking and DAO governance, and is capped at a 10 billion token supply. That gives it structure. What gives it teeth is timing.
Analysts are tossing around figures like 50x, 100x—even 150x—for Layer Brett during this bull cycle. And while XRP ETF approval might give Ripple a bump, Layer Brett doesn’t need an SEC greenlight to start flying. It just needs buyers—and they’re showing up fast.
Most importantly, Layer Brett isn’t trying to be the next XRP. It’s positioning itself as something entirely new: a meme-born, utility-backed rocket with staking yield built in and social buzz baked into its DNA. When traders talk about where the real upside lives, Layer Brett is more than just a mention—it’s a headline.
Conclusion
The XRP ETF filings are a big deal for Ripple. They mark a turning point, signaling maturity, regulation, and long-awaited clarity. But for traders chasing velocity, those same traits can feel like a ceiling. Layer Brett, on the other hand, is raw, early, and still on the runway. It doesn’t need institutional legitimacy to move—it just needs momentum. And right now, it’s got plenty.
Presale: Layer Brett | Fast & Rewarding Layer 2 Blockchain
Telegram: Telegram: View @layerbrett
X: (1) Layer Brett (@LayerBrett) / X
Disclaimer: This media platform provides the content of this article on an "as-is" basis, without any warranties or representations of any kind, express or implied. We assume no responsibility for any inaccuracies, errors, or omissions. We do not assume any responsibility or liability for the accuracy, content, images, videos, licenses, completeness, legality, or reliability of the information presented herein. Any concerns, complaints, or copyright issues related to this article should be directed to the content provider mentioned above.
/div>