Crypto liquidations show how much borrowed money sits behind a price move. When a leveraged trade loses too much value, the exchange closes it automatically. That forced exit adds to the move that caused it.
A selloff that began late on October 8 and ran into early October 9 cleared about $1.19 billion of leveraged positions in 24 hours. Longs took almost all of it. Ethereum traders were hit harder than Bitcoin traders once the size of each market is taken into account.
This article collects the key numbers from that event and from earlier ones. It also explains how liquidation prices are set, how cascades form, and what the data says about managing risk.
The October 2026 Flush at a Glance
Coinglass data puts total liquidations at $1.191 billion over 24 hours. Of that, $1.056 billion came from long positions and $135 million from shorts. A total of 192,576 traders were affected.
That is nearly eight longs for every short. A split this lopsided means most traders were positioned for prices to rise. Bitcoin had been trading between $83,000 and $87,000 while those positions built up, so a break below that range pushed many trades past their liquidation prices at once.
| Measure | Figure |
|---|---|
| Total liquidations | $1.191 billion |
| Long liquidations | $1.056 billion |
| Short liquidations | $135 million |
| Traders liquidated | 192,576 |
| Largest single liquidation | $19.98 million (ETH-USD on Hyperliquid) |
The trigger came from outside crypto. Minutes from the September 15-16 Federal Reserve meeting showed that most officials expect another rate hike. In the same period, a report that the White House had asked the Pentagon for strike options against Iran lifted Brent crude 2% above $102 a barrel.
The ten-year Treasury yield also reached 5.31%, near its highest level since 2002. Two pressures landed at once on a market with a lot of leverage.
The same mechanism ran in reverse later that day. Bitcoin fell from about $83,200 to roughly $80,400, then rose to about $82,200 after President Trump said the United States would not strike Iran before the midterms. About $25 million was liquidated over the next four hours, and around 78% of it was shorts.
One point is often missed. The $1.19 billion measures the notional value of closed positions, not trader losses. A trader with $1,000 of margin at 10x leverage holds $10,000 of exposure, and the statistic counts the $10,000 while the trader loses $1,000.
Data providers also count in different ways. Some venues share only sampled data, which is why totals rarely match across sources.
The long and short split matters as much as the total. Long liquidations are forced sales, and short liquidations are forced purchases. Each one moves in the same direction as price, so it adds to the move instead of softening it.
The $1.056 billion of long liquidations was passive selling that entered a falling market. It came from margin rules alone, not from anyone’s view on price.
Bookmap notes that liquidations tend to occur at swing highs and lows, near support and resistance, and at round price levels. They are most likely when trades are crowded. That is why a break of a well-known level can set off a burst of forced orders.
Bitcoin vs Ether: The Sixfold Gap
In raw dollars, Ether liquidations reached about $356 million and Bitcoin liquidations about $298 million. That is a gap of roughly 20%. It looks small until market size is added.
Ether’s market value is less than a fifth of Bitcoin’s. CoinDesk’s calculation shows about $1.2 million liquidated per $1 billion of Ether market value. For Bitcoin the figure was about $180,000, so the Ether rate was about six times higher.
| Asset | Longs | Shorts | Total | Liquidated per $1B of market value |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Bitcoin | $273M | $31.5M | $298M | About $180,000 |
| Ether | $294M | $56.5M | $356M | About $1.2 million |
The long and short figures come from Coinglass, and the totals come from CoinDesk, so they differ slightly. Bitcoin had $273 million of longs against $31.5 million of shorts. Ether had $294 million against $56.5 million.
Three factors help explain the gap. Ether’s price swings have been larger than Bitcoin’s for years, so a trade at the same leverage is more likely to reach its liquidation price. Traders also treat Ether as a higher-risk version of the same view, which can lead to more leverage.
A share of Bitcoin also sits in spot ETFs and long-term holdings. Those use no leverage and cannot be force-sold, which lowers Bitcoin’s liquidation density. Ether fell more than 3% to about $2,490 during the event.
Traders who apply the same leverage to both assets are not taking the same risk. An Ether position has a higher chance of touching its liquidation price on any given day.
This is why per-market-value figures are used to compare assets. They remove the effect of size and show how much leverage sits in each market. The comparison covers one event, so it is a snapshot and not a long-term trend, but it fits Ether’s record of larger price swings.
Other Assets Caught in the Sweep
Other large tokens were hit too. Solana positions accounted for about $71 million, XRP about $34 million and NEAR about $25 million. All remaining tokens together made up around $119 million.
| Asset | Liquidations |
|---|---|
| Ether | $356 million |
| Bitcoin | $298 million |
| Solana | $71 million |
| XRP | $34 million |
| NEAR | $25 million |
| All other tokens | $119 million |
These amounts add up to about $903 million, below the $1.191 billion Coinglass total. The gap likely comes from the use of different data providers. Sampled data and different counting rules can change totals.
Decentralized venues now play a large part in leveraged trading. BlockchainReporter notes that Hyperliquid’s perpetual DEX market posted $218 billion in volume in a single month. On-chain liquidations can be seen in real time, which is not always true on centralized exchanges.
Smaller tokens often move further than large ones during a flush because their order books are thinner. In the October 2025 event, ADL distortions sent some thin assets down more than 80%. The $119 million in other tokens in October 2026 was more than the Solana and XRP totals combined.
How Leverage Sets the Distance to Liquidation
The link between leverage and risk is simple math. The price move that wipes out margin is roughly 100% divided by the leverage used. Maintenance margin and fees move the real trigger slightly closer.
| Leverage | Approximate move to liquidation | What that move means for Bitcoin |
|---|---|---|
| 2x | About 50% | A full bear market |
| 5x | About 20% | A deep correction |
| 10x | About 10% | A bad week |
| 20x | About 5% | A bad day |
| 50x | About 2% | Normal intraday noise |
| 100x | About 1% | A single volatile candle |
At 10x leverage, a move of about 10% against the trade uses up the starting margin. At 20x, that room shrinks to about 5%. At 50x, ordinary daily swings can end the trade.
BlockchainReporter gives a worked example. A long opened at $100,000 with 10x leverage and a 0.5% maintenance margin rate has a liquidation price near $90,500, a 9.5% drop. The same trade as a short liquidates near $109,500.
A second example uses a $70,000 Bitcoin long at 10x with $7,000 of isolated margin. A 5% fall to $66,500 cuts the margin to about $3,500, which is half of the collateral. The position liquidates near $63,317, about 9.5% below entry.
Two margin terms drive these numbers. Initial margin is the collateral needed to open a trade, and opening a $10,000 position at 10x may need around $1,000. Maintenance margin is the minimum equity needed to keep it open.
Once equity falls below the maintenance level, the liquidation engine can step in. Exchanges set this level to stop a losing trade from sliding into negative equity. Being right about direction does not help if the trade cannot survive the swings on the way.
Most exchanges use the mark price, not the last traded price, to trigger liquidation. The mark price blends spot prices from several exchanges. This lowers the chance that one sudden spike on a single venue sets off mass liquidations.
Some exchanges warn traders before a liquidation. A margin call is a notice that equity is nearing the minimum, and it gives the trader a chance to add funds or cut the position. Bitpanda notes that other platforms close positions with no warning.
Bookmap explains why many crypto exchanges prefer forced liquidation to margin calls. Crypto has little regulation, and third parties often cannot enforce rules across borders. A forced close protects the exchange without needing the trader to respond.
Some exchanges use partial liquidation. They cut only part of the position to lift the margin ratio back above the minimum. If that works, the rest of the trade stays open.
Liquidation Events in Context
Context matters when reading a number like $1.19 billion. The October 2026 flush is close to the March 2020 COVID crash and below the FTX collapse. It is also above the 2025 daily average of $400 million to $500 million, by roughly two to three times.
| Event or period | Reported liquidations |
|---|---|
| COVID crash, March 2020 | About $1.2 billion |
| FTX collapse | About $1.6 billion |
| October 10-11, 2025 | Over $19 billion in 24 hours |
| All of 2025 | About $150 billion |
| 2025 daily average | $400 million to $500 million |
| October 8-9, 2026 | About $1.19 billion |
The record came on October 10-11, 2025. Days after Bitcoin set an all-time high above $126,000, a US announcement of 100% tariffs on Chinese imports hit a crowded market. Long positions made up 85% to 90% of the total, according to CoinGlass.
Some estimates put the real figure at $30 billion to $40 billion once delayed platform reports are counted. Auto-deleveraging, or ADL, played a part. This last-resort tool closes positions held by the most profitable traders on the other side when an exchange’s insurance fund runs short, and it sent some thin assets down more than 80%.
A cascade works the same way at any size. A first wave of liquidations sells at market, the selling pushes price lower, and the next group of liquidation prices is reached. Thin overnight order books make each wave move price further.
Exchanges keep insurance funds to cover losses when a position closes at a price worse than its bankruptcy price. That is the level where losses use up all posted collateral. If the fund runs short, ADL begins.
For scale, the 2025 total of about $150 billion works out to $400 million to $500 million forced out every day. Single-day events like October 10-11 sit far above that line.
Open Interest, Funding and Price Data
Open interest counts contracts that remain unsettled. On October 8, Crypto Briefing reported that Ether open interest fell 7.53% in one session to about $31.8 billion, or roughly 12.49 million ETH. Funding rates also turned negative on some venues, which means shorts were paying to hold positions.
Coinglass currently shows Ether open interest near $31.9 billion. That is the level to watch for signs of a rebuild. Open interest is not bullish or bearish on its own, so traders read it next to price and funding.
Funding rates show what each side pays to hold exposure. A rate that stays positive for a long stretch means long positions are crowded. A rate that turns negative means shorts are paying longs.
The long and short ratio adds the directional split. None of these gauges predicts price. They describe how fragile the structure is, and a market with high open interest, positive funding and a heavy long skew will produce large liquidation totals if it falls.
| Data point | Figure |
|---|---|
| Ether open interest (October 8) | Down 7.53% to about $31.8 billion |
| Ether open interest in ETH | About 12.49 million ETH |
| Bitcoin weekly close | $82,123, down 2.81% |
| Ether weekly close | $2,488, down 6.77% |
| Bitcoin low during the event | About $80,400 |
| Bitcoin prior trading range | $83,000 to $87,000 |
MEXC Learn outlines three ways this could resolve. In a clean deleveraging, open interest stays lower and funding settles near neutral. In a fast rebuild, open interest snaps back and funding turns positive again, which restores the same risk at a lower price.
In a continued macro squeeze, high oil prices and Treasury yields and another Fed hike would keep pressure on risk assets. That would likely bring repeated smaller liquidation events instead of one large one. The October Fed meeting and the oil price are the main outside factors to track.
Price levels matter for repair. Bitcoin’s former range of $83,000 to $87,000 has broken, and MEXC Learn calls a return to its floor the reference point for structural repair. The speed at which funding moves from negative back to positive is the cleanest read on sentiment.
Risk Control Numbers Traders Use
The sources agree on a short list of rules. Lower leverage moves the liquidation price away from entry. Position size matters as much as leverage, since it sets how much of an account is at risk.
| Control | Figure or rule |
|---|---|
| Risk per trade | 1% to 2% of account equity |
| Collateral reserve | 20% to 30% of trading capital |
| Leverage | 5x or below for room to handle normal swings |
| Stop-loss distance | At least 30% to 50% of the gap between entry and liquidation |
| Price alerts | At 5% and 10% above the liquidation price |
| Margin mode for risky trades | Isolated margin |
A stop-loss is an order the trader sets in advance. In the $100,000 example, with liquidation at $90,500, a stop between $95,000 and $96,500 exits with a planned loss. A stop placed right next to the liquidation price offers little protection.
Isolated margin limits the loss to the collateral assigned to one position. Cross margin uses the whole account balance as backup, which can delay liquidation but puts more at risk. Stops can also slip in fast markets, so no method removes the risk fully.
A stop-loss and a liquidation lead to different outcomes. With a stop-loss, the trader picks the exit and keeps the remaining capital minus a planned loss. With a liquidation, the exchange picks the exit, the trader loses most or all of the margin, and slippage and fees can add costs.
Bitsgap also warns against heavy leverage into known events such as rate decisions, inflation reports and major regulatory news. The October 2026 flush followed that pattern, with Fed minutes and a geopolitical report landing on a market full of long positions.
Bookmap also advises watching futures open interest on the exchange being traded. Historically high open interest can show the market is over-leveraged. In stress, those positions can be liquidated in a cascade that leads to a flash crash.
Funding costs matter too. A long held while funding is high and positive pays a cost every eight hours. Over days, that cost can push the liquidation price closer without any adverse price move.
Liquidation maps and heatmaps show where large groups of leveraged positions sit across price levels. When price nears a dense cluster, it often moves through quickly as forced orders fill. Bitsgap notes that a liquidation price shifts as profit and loss on other positions changes, so a safety margin worked out for one trade can mislead when several share an account.
If a liquidation does happen, BlockchainReporter advises saving trade logs and screenshots right away. Exchanges can purge detailed logs after 30 to 90 days. In the United States, a liquidation is treated as a taxable disposition, so records matter at tax time.
What the Numbers Show
The October 2026 data points to one main lesson. Liquidations depend more on where leverage has built up than on how far prices fall. A 20% gap in raw dollars between Ether and Bitcoin became a sixfold gap once market size was counted.
The figure is also a measure of exposure, not of losses. Read it that way, it helps compare assets and events. Open interest, funding rates and position size give traders the best view of how fragile the market is before the next move.
Sources
- Crypto Liquidations Explained: Why Ethereum Was Hit Harder Than Bitcoin in the $1.19B Flush (MEXC Learn)
- What Is Liquidation in Crypto and How Can You Avoid It (Bitpanda)
- What Is Liquidation in Trading and How It Works (Velotrade)
- Crypto Liquidation: Causes and How to Avoid It (Bitsgap)
- Liquidation Explained: How Perpetual Futures Liquidation Works
- What Are Liquidations in Crypto? (Bookmap)
- Crypto Liquidations Explained: What Traders Must Know (BlockchainReporter)







