TLDR
- A dormant Bitcoin address moved 30 BTC worth about $1.88 million after nearly 15 years.
- The address appears in a New York lawsuit seeking ownership of inactive Bitcoin holdings.
- Galaxy Digital reported that more listed dormant wallets moved BTC in February and June.
- A defendant moved to dismiss the lawsuit, arguing Bitcoin addresses cannot be sued.
- Lawyer Edwin Mata said inactivity does not prove abandonment under property law.
A dormant Bitcoin wallet transferred 30 BTC worth about $1.88 million after remaining inactive for nearly 15 years. The transaction came as a New York lawsuit continues to dispute ownership of thousands of inactive Bitcoin addresses. Meanwhile, the latest movement has added fresh attention to the legal battle surrounding long-dormant holdings.
Dormant wallet resumes activity after 15 years
Blockchain records showed that address “1KV47” completed its first outgoing transfer on Saturday. The wallet originally received 30 Bitcoin in August 2011 and stayed inactive until now. Galaxy Research shared the transaction after detecting the unexpected movement.
🌚 Awakened — dormant 14+ years
30.00 BTC ($1.88M) untouched since first received 2011-08-07 (14.9y ago) — just moved in block 956627Address: 1KV47ho8CG2vcTtBQwkfNCgzUVBuBeZkLG
Attribution: Noah Doe #38530 · Salomon Client Dusted💰 Realized PnL: +$1.84M (+719,353% gain) -…
— Galaxy Research (@glxyresearch) July 4, 2026
The address appears among 39,069 wallets listed in a New York lawsuit. The plaintiffs seek ownership rights over inactive Bitcoin holdings under the state’s lost-property law. However, the legal dispute remains unresolved and continues before the court.
The lawsuit also includes addresses widely linked to Bitcoin creator Satoshi Nakamoto. According to Timechain Index founder Sani, those addresses collectively hold about 3.7 million BTC. At current prices, the holdings carry an estimated value of about $234 billion.
More dormant Bitcoin wallets become active
Recent blockchain activity shows more dormant addresses have resumed transferring funds. Galaxy Digital research head Alex Thorn reported that 31 listed wallets moved 17,527 BTC during June. Earlier, only five addresses transferred 4,834 BTC during February.
The growing number of active wallets has increased attention around the ongoing legal proceedings. However, blockchain data alone does not explain why the owners moved the funds. The transfers also provide no direct evidence about ownership or legal claims.
The latest transaction involved only 30 Bitcoin, yet it matched the broader pattern. Several dormant Bitcoin wallets connected to the lawsuit have now recorded fresh activity. Consequently, researchers continue tracking additional movements from the listed addresses.
Legal challenge questions ownership claims
A defendant identifying as “John Doe 33” filed a motion to dismiss the lawsuit on Friday. The filing argues that Bitcoin addresses are only data strings and cannot face legal action. The defendant therefore challenged the foundation of the plaintiffs’ claims.
Edwin Mata, lawyer and CEO of Brickken, questioned the legal argument behind the case. He said, “The core flaw is that inactivity is not abandonment.” He added that property law generally requires proof of intent before someone abandons ownership rights.
Mata also stated that dormant Bitcoin addresses could simply represent long-term cold storage or wallets with lost private keys. He explained that private keys remain essential for controlling Bitcoin assets. Without those keys, he said, the lawsuit rests on “very weak” legal grounds.
